Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Lesson 2 - Math


Universal Design for Learning Lesson Plan

Teacher: Esmeralda Tully   Date: 4/17/13  Subject: Mathematics

Common Core Standard:
NY.CC.5.OA: Operations and Algebraic Thinking
Write and Interpret Numerical Expressions
5.OA.1:Use parenthesis, brackets, or braces in numerical expressions, and evaluate expressions with these symbols

Behavioral Objective:
Given the application ‘Ooops,’ and the PEMDAS strategy, the student will be able to add parenthesis to make 4 out of 6 equations true.

Materials Needed:
  • Computer with internet access
  • iPad
  • MyScript Calculator—App on iPad
  • Math Order of Operations—App on iPad
  • Ooops: The Order of Operations Game —App on iPad
  • Loose leaf paper
  • Pencils

Procedures:

  •  Activating Prior Knowledge
  • The teacher will assess/review prior knowledge by utilizing the Math Order of Operations application on the iPad. On the home screen of this app, there are two aliens who have solved “3 x (5 + 2)= “ two different ways (left to right and order of operations). The student must answer the question, “Which answer is correct?” and explain her rationale. This scenario is similar to the previous lesson’s activating prior knowledge stage, except this time, the student should know which answer is correct and why.
  • Afterward, the student will watch the accompanying short clip in order to activate her background knowledge on the order of operations.
  • Next, the teacher will resort back to the original problem “3 x (5 + 2) =” and will pose this question, “How would the answer be different if there were no parenthesis? What would you solve first? What would the new answer be?”

  • Teacher Modeling
  • Teacher will model how to use the interactive manipulative on Ooops: The Order of Operations Game to drag and add parenthesis into place to make the equation true.
  • The example problem will be “4 + 2 x 3 = 10.” The teacher will remind the student that any operations inside the parenthesis happen before those outside. Teacher will utilize thinking aloud to verbalize her thinking and reasoning.
    • “Where can I add parenthesis to this expression to make the equation equal to 10? If I put parenthesis around 4 + 2, then I must solve that first because parenthesis are the first step in PEMDAS. I would then get 6 x 3, which equals 18. No, that’s not right, the answer must equal ten. Let me try putting parenthesis around 2 x 3, which would be simplified to 4 + 6. Yes that’s right! 4 + 6 = 10.”
  • After the teacher is done with the problem (adding the parenthesis), the student will be permitted to click the “check answer” tab to see if the teacher’s answer is correct.
        
  • Guided Practice
  • Teacher will give the student the iPad to practice using Ooops: The Order of Operations Game application to drag and add parenthesis into place to make the equations true. Teacher will direct the student’s attention to the directions, which scaffold the child by reminding them that any operations inside the parenthesis happen before those outside.
  • Student will be provided with loose leaf and a pencil to use as scrap paper to figure out where the parenthesis should go. Teacher will remind the student that it is okay if they do not get the problem correctly the first time; trial and error is a good method for solving problems.
  • The teacher will be working next to the student on the problems as well. The teacher and the student will solve each problem, one at a time. After each problem, the teacher and the student will compare their answers and will have conversations about how they arrived at the answer.
  • When the student is finished and has added the parenthesis to the problem, they will click the “check” tab to check their answer.

  • Independent Practice
  • The student will independently solve six numerical expressions on Ooops: The Order of Operations Game application, by adding parenthesis to make the equations true.

Assessment:
The teacher will review student work to determine whether they were able to add parenthesis to make 4 out of 6 equations true. The teacher will also informally assess the student during guided practice.

UDL ELEMENTS:

Multiple Means of Representation:

2.3   Support decoding text, mathematical notation, and symbols:   The Math Order of Operations clipused digital text with an accompanying human voice recording to meaningfully expose the student to the mathematical content.

3.2   Highlight patterns, critical features, big ideas, and relationships:   The teacher used examples and non-examples to highlight critical features (the alien scenario during the activating prior knowledge stage). The teacher also highlighted previously learned skills that could be used to solve unfamiliar problems.

3.4   Maximize transfer and generalization:   The teacher prompted the use of mnemonic strategies and devices—PEMDAS .

Multiple Means of Engagement:

7.1   Optimize individual choice and autonomy:   The Ooops application provided choices in such things as the level of perceived challenge. For each problem, there is a tab at the bottom that allows the child to increase the difficulty of the problem (Level 1- Level 5). The student also has the option of clicking “new puzzle,” which allows them to choose the problems that they want to solve.

9.3   Develop self-assessment and reflection:   The ‘check’ tab acts as a means for the learner to get feedback, have access to alternative scaffolds, and support understanding progress in a manner that is understandable and timely.

Multiple Means of Action and Expression:

5.2   Use multiple tools for construction and composition:   Student will use the Ooops application, which provides virtual manipulatives to solve numerical expressions.

6.2   Support planning and strategy development:   The teacher uses thinking aloud to model think-alouds of the process.

*****************************************************************************
edTPA rubric components:

#4Justification of Instruction & Support:
           
            Clear connections to research and/or theory
  • Results related to teaching students with learning difficulties how to use a variety of mathematics cognitive strategies have been very positive and meet rigorous criteria used to identify evidence-based practices (Montague, 2009).
  • Cognitive strategies are designed to help students remember the step-by-step process involved in solving computation or word problems. Memory tools, including mnemonic devices, key letters, key words, or key sentences help students remember procedural steps for solving problems (Miller, Stringfellow, Kaffar, Ferreira, & Mancl, 2011).

            Clear connections to the learner’s strengths & needs
  • During the previous mathematics lesson, Leydi’s work indicated that she was able to independently solve numerical expressions using the correct order of operations. Therefore, I decided to progress to this lesson, by challenging her to add parenthesis to an equation to make it true.

            Plans for specific adaptations (if needed)
  • Thus far, Leydi’s mathematics skills seem to be pretty strong, so no adaptations have been made as of yet. I will monitor student progress during this lesson, and will adapt the lesson if necessary. For example, if the problems are far too easy for her, I will increase the level of difficulty by having her solve problems in level 2 or higher.

#5 Supporting Language/Communication Development

            Identification of:
1)    vocabulary and/or symbols
  • The teacher highlighted previously learned skills (the mneumonic device PEMDAS) that could be used to solve these unfamiliar problems.

2)    language/communication demands related to behavioral objective
  • In order to help Leydi with the language needed in order to carry out the behavioral objective, she will be provided with a scaffold that reminds her that any operations inside the parenthesis happen before those outside. This scaffold is at the top of the page, and will be removed once a certain amount of problems have been correctly solved.

Justification: why supports will provide access to the learning task/behavioral objective
  • The PEMDAS strategy will help the student remember the step-by-step process involved in solving the order of operations computation problems. PEMDAS acts as a scaffold for the student’s future reference or a springboard to activate memory on how to perform the task.
  • The ‘check’ tab acts as a support because at any point, the student can check their answer by pressing the check button to see how their parenthesis have changed the result. This will show them the steps of the problem as the operations are performed in order.

Justification: why supports will provide access to the demonstration of
1)    language function
  • As the student collaborates with the teacher, she will develop greater language proficiency. The teacher and the student can have conversations about their thought processes when they solved the problems.
  • The mnemonic device PEMDAS provides access to the demonstration of language function, because the key words represent the first letter in the steps used to solve the problem.

2)    learning task/behavioral objective
  • Teacher modeling demonstrates how students can achieve the behavioral objective by breaking down the lesson, and modeling each step very carefully.
  • The mnemonic device not only helps students remember the steps involved in solving the problems, but it prompts the student to perform an overt action.

Justification: why supports move the learner toward maintenance and generalization or self-directed use of the targeted vocab/symbols or language/communication
  • The support that the PEMDAS mnemonic device provides, in conjunction with the support that the teacher will provide during modeling and guided practice, shall move Leydi towards generalization of the targeted vocabulary and communication. As I model the behavioral objective and the use of strategies, I will use thinking aloud so that it improves Leydi’s understanding of these processes. When it comes time for Leydi to complete the task independently, she will have witnessed a model of the performance, had an opportunity to practice the task with the teacher’s guidance, and had the teacher’s example and their own mnemonic device to use as a reference.

#6 Planning Assessments to Monitor & Support Learning
Assessment: aligned with baseline data
  • The child’s baseline data was gathered during pre-assessment, by both a systematic observation and a teacher made test. I used this information to guide instruction and align it with the assessment for lesson one and two. Leydi met the behavioral objective for lesson one, and the results from the assessment helped to guide and improve my instruction for this lesson.

Assessment provides evidence for monitoring learner’s progress at different points
in the learning segment
  • The student will not just be assessed at the end of the lesson. The teacher will informally monitor student progress through learner questions and responses during instruction, and teacher observation of the learner.

Assessment reflects appropriate levels of challenge and support (in light of
learner’s needs, strengths & behavioral objective)
  • The teacher will use the information from informally monitoring the student in order to modify support and feedback as necessary.
  • This lesson will appropriately challenge and support the child. The child’s strengths will be supported because she has proficient knowledge related to the four computational operations (i.e., addition, subtraction, multiplication, division). However, she will be challenged to take what she knows (computation skills), and the order operations, to correctly add parenthesis to make numerical expressions true. PEMDAS, teacher modeling, and the collaboration during guided practice will support her to achieve this task.

Assessment: designed to provide diagnostic information about where learner
may need additional support to make further progress and work toward
generalized and maintained OR self-directed use and knowledge and/or skills.
  • By informally assessing the child through observations, the teacher will be able to make note of exactly where and why the child struggled during the lesson.
  • By assessing the student’s work, the teacher will be able to pinpoint where the student had difficulty, and which order the student solved the operations. This way, the teacher can provide additional, individualized support to the student so that they can make further progress.




REFLECTION
             On Wednesday, April 17th, I implemented my second math lesson with my tutee Leydi Sanchez. This lesson was so beneficial for the student; it combined culturally responsive teaching, universal design for learning, and explicit instruction, which is vital for teaching diverse learners.



            The assessment data from the previous lesson indicated that Leydi was able to use the cognitive strategy (the mnemonic device PEMDAS) to remember the step-by-step process involved in solving order of operations problems. I used this data to guide instruction for this lesson. Due to the strength that I observed in Leydi’s newly developed mathematical procedural skills, I thought that it was appropriate to challenge her.
The behavioral objective for this lesson was: given the application ‘Ooops,’ and the PEMDAS strategy, the student will be able to add parenthesis to make 4 out of 6 equations true. The PEMDAS strategy was one support that provided access to the behavioral objective. It acted as a springboard to help Leydi remember the step-by-step processes involved in solving the order of operation computation problems. The ‘check’ tab on the game also acted as a support because at any point, the student could check their answer by pressing the check button to see how their parenthesis had changed the result. This showed her the steps of the problem as the operations are performed in order.
In order to assess/review prior knowledge, I utilized the Math Order of Operations application on the iPad. This application supported decoding text, mathematical notation, and symbols (multiple means of representation); the clip used digital text with an accompanying human voice recording to meaningfully expose the student to the mathematical content. I also incorporated culturally responsive teaching. I utilized a guided and informal discussion with the student in order to highlight patterns, critical features, big ideas, and relationships. This informal discussion provided Leydi with the opportunity to construct meaning, and allowed the teacher and the student to learn from each other by sharing their interpretations and questions.
For culturally responsive teaching, it is important for teachers to use a range of culturally sensitive instructional methods and materials. One such method, thinking-aloud, was used during teacher modeling. I utilized the think-aloud method, a procedure that takes advantage of the benefits of modeling, in order to demonstrate what to do, why, how, and when with Ooops, the order of operations game. This worked very well and it improved Leydi’s understanding of the step-by-step process. As I watched her during the subsequent stages of the lesson, I noticed that she talked through her thought processes when solving the problems.
During guided and independent practice, the student was provided with a range of instructional materials. She had the opportunity to use multiple tools for construction and composition: Leydi could use the iPad or my iPhone to play the Ooops game, and she was also provided with pencil and paper to use as scrap paper. When Leydi was finished with each problem, she was permitted to click the “check answer” tab. This developed self-assessment and reflection; it acted as a means for the learner to get feedback and have access to alternative scaffolds. Leydi was so excited to finish a problem and check to see if they were correct.
In guided practice, I worked alongside Leydi and solved the problems on a separate sheet of paper, just as I had done in the previous lesson. After each problem, we would compare answers before she checked them on the iPad. I felt that this was important because collaboration is involved in virtually every learning situation. People from different cultures and backgrounds need to learn how to work together to deal with common concerns. Due to the fact that Leydi did not have another student to work with, I felt that it was my job to develop a sense of reciprocity: “we win/I win.” This collaboration also provided access to the demonstration of language function; the student developed greater language proficiency.
During independent practice, Leydi had to independently demonstrate her ability to meet the behavioral objective. She was able to generalize and maintain what she had learned from my modeling and support, and she self-directed herself in using the PEMDAS strategy to exceed the behavioral objective: Leydi was able to add parenthesis to make 7 out of 8 equations true. As stated earlier, the goal was to solve six problems. However, Leydi was so engaged that she wanted to keep working.
The application was so dense, filled with so many useful resources; it provided positive reinforcements for correctly solving problems (stickers); choices in the level of perceived challenge (child has option to increase the difficulty of the problems); a “check answer” tab that developed self-assessment and reflection. There was also a button “new puzzle,” that I allowed Leydi to click. She was told how many problems she must solve, not what problems she had to solve. She was permitted to choose the equations that she wanted to work on.
This lesson was a huge success. By incorporating Leydi’s interests and giving her the power of options, she was able to stay completely engaged in the task. It was almost as if she had forgotten that we were doing schoolwork. It was so wonderful to not only see her learning, but witness her having a blast while doing so. Education should be something that all students enjoy and feel a personal connection with. I feel so proud that I was able to both teach and reach my child. If this lesson were to be implemented class wide, it would not only reduce barriers for culturally diverse learners, but it would increase the learning opportunities for all learners. 

No comments:

Post a Comment